Yuku free message boards

nkfro wrote:

---

luckyinbg wrote:

---

nkfro wrote:

---

luckyinbg wrote:

---

OK. The phrasing of your post led me to believe, evidently incorrectly, that you knew something, or had heard something that indicated he had said he was not interested. It's all good. Next.

Lucky, a common issue here at SO is one person reading more into a post than what was said. It works just as well with media sources. Take the words at face value.

Fro, I didn't want, nor need a lecture/reprisal for my question. Your post was clear. You made a pretty direct statement concerning Coach Knights lack of desire. I didn't read anything into it other than the fact you stated he had a lack of desire. Perhaps you should choose your words more carefully and not blame other's for interpetation. Look at your words. I took them at face value, I simply wanted an explanation.

You were given an explanation but you did not like it or how it was phrased - not my problem. My words were accurate as yours claim that he had expressed specific interest in coming to WKU which he had not. We both drew conclusions based off of the same information and look at the disparity in the opinions! You were not asked to agree nor was it ever expected - and for that matter, your agreement would be irrelevant as it obviously would not be your opinion. Back off.

No, your explanation was fine. Your original message was the one that was in question. That was when I asked for an explanation. You stated that I read something in to your post. The issue was your original post, which was very clear, and to the point. So you back off.

If you will look at the posts on this thread from the beginning, you will see my point, at least I think you will. You made the statement, I questioned it and asked for an explanation. You gave an explanation. I accepted the explanation. After I said, OK.... you said I read something into your post, which is wrong. That is where your misunderstanding is.